“Canada deserves a Green New Deal, not more fossil fuel projects.”
That’s how many climate campaigners—including Clayton Thomas-Muller of 350.org—responded after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Tuesday announced his federal government approved an expansion of the Trans Mountain tar sands pipeline, just a day after the country’s House of Commons voted to declare a climate emergency. Ahead of the anticipated move, critics charged that green-lighting the project would make an “absolute mockery” of the emergency declaration.
Greta Thunberg, the Swedish teen whose solo strike outside her country’s parliament last year ignited a global youth climate movement, called the decision “shameful.”
Tzeporah Berman, international program director at Stand.earth, said the approval was “inconsistent” with the House of Commons declaration. As Berman put it, “If we are going to fight climate change in Canada, we need to face the fact that we can no longer expand fossil fuel production and infrastructure.”
Click Here: cd universidad catolica
The Canadian government purchased the “climate-killing” pipeline from energy giant Kinder Morgan last year, after the company faced construction delays due to widespread opposition from environmental and Indigenous groups. The expansion project involves building a new pipeline roughly parallel to an existing one that runs from Alberta’s oil sands to a coastal terminal in Burnaby, British Columbia.
Trudeau’s government claimed in a statement Tuesday that “every dollar the federal government earns from this project will be invested in Canada’s clean energy transition.” The statement said that while approval for the project was based on the confidence that “strong environmental protections have been and continue to be put in place” and “consultations with Indigenous peoples involved meaningful, two-way dialogue” that fulfilled its legal obligations, the government plans to “launch the next phase of engagement with Indigenous groups on ways they could share in the benefits of the expansion, including through equity ownership or revenue sharing.”
Several Indigenous leaders and groups such as Protect The Inlet, meanwhile, maintain that the expansion project “lacks consent from many Indigenous peoples and Nations along the route and tanker radius,” and remain staunchly opposed to it.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT